Compare
Design software knows the sofa. Builder software knows the schedule.
Firms that work alongside builders need both in one record. That is the gap CasaVoga was built for.
By type of tool
| Design-firm software | Builder software | Spreadsheets and email | CasaVoga | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FF&E specification | Core strength | Limited | By hand | Spec book, tied to rooms and POs |
| Dates set by construction | Usually separate | Builder-run | From memory | Decide-by and order-by dates |
| Purchase orders | Core strength | Trade-focused | By hand | Through three-way match |
| Allowances | Limited | Core strength | By hand | Ledger with overrun workflow |
| What each decision blocks | Rarely | Rarely | From memory | 1,145-decision dependency map |
| AI with sign-off | Add-on assistance | Varies | None | Approval gate on everything outbound |
| Your own brand | Rarely | Rarely | Not applicable | Full white label |
When CasaVoga is the wrong choice
It is built for one kind of practice. Some firms are better served elsewhere.
You want your general ledger inside your design software
CasaVoga exports to accounting and does not replace it.
You mostly do e-design or room refreshes
A lighter tool will cost less and suit the work.
You need to draw in it
CasaVoga links to CAD and rendering output. It does not author it.
You are the general contractor
Builder software is made for running the whole job.