Decision simulator

See what a late answer costs the schedule.

Run a custom home week by week. Answer late, pay late, and watch the move-in date and the cost of delay change.

Start the simulator Request a walkthrough

How the simulator works

  1. 01.

    Run the project

    Start the clock. Real decisions from the Atlas come due on dates worked back from their lead time. Leave one unanswered and it starts costing days.

  2. 02.

    Or ask what if

    Try an indecisive client, slow payments or a long-lead surprise, or set how late each decision comes in.

  3. 03.

    Float absorbs a little

    Every milestone has a few days of float. Past it, the milestone slips, and so does every one after it.

  4. 04.

    See what it costs

    Waiting decisions show what they block. Missed locks name the rework. Add a weekly carrying cost to price the delay.

See what moves

  1. Survey, geotechnical, zoning, EGLE screen (if late: Footprint redesign; loss of months)
  2. Design and permit set (if late: Re-permit and re-engineering)
  3. Long-lead order (if late: Framing delays or reframing)
  4. Excavation and footings (if late: Concrete cutting or lost ceiling height)
  5. Slab and foundation walls (if late: Sawcutting slab; trench drains relocated; floor build-up mismatches)
  6. Floor and wall framing (if late: Structural rework; visible soffits)
  7. Blocking (if late: Opening finished walls)
  8. HVAC rough (if late: Visible relocations; hood mismatches and code issues)
  9. Plumbing rough (if late: Open tile or wall; new valve body)
  10. Electrical and low-voltage rough (if late: Patching drywall; visible relocations)
  11. Insulation and drywall (if late: Reopening walls)
  12. Cabinet shop drawings (if late: Remake; rework of panels and cutouts)
  13. Interior doors and trim (if late: Reorder or field modification)
  14. Tile and stone (if late: Demolition of tile; waterproofing warranty voided)
  15. Cabinets and countertops (if late: Refabrication; lost stone lots)
  16. Paint and flooring protection (if late: Respray; floor damage)
  17. Trim-out and fixtures (if late: Return trips)
  18. Final inspections and certificate of occupancy (if late: Occupancy delay; loan conversion delay)
  19. FF&E and art install, punch, closeout (if late: Damage and double handling)

Sample project. The lock order and rework come from the Residential Design Atlas. Weeks and float are planning estimates, not a published standard.

Walk the decisions firms make every week

Go/no-go gate for a construction-led studio

Should the firm take this project?

  1. Is the project type in scope (new build, major remodel, boutique commercial)?
    • Yes
    • No: Refer out.
  2. Are plans still changeable, and are selections on time against the builder's schedule?
    • Yes, on time
    • No, selections overdue or plans fixed: Continue only with a reduced scope or a rush premium.
  3. Are the construction and FF&E budgets stated and above the firm's minimum?
    • Yes
    • Unknown: Hold for a budget conversation before any site visit.
    • Below minimum: Decline or refer out.
  4. Are all decision-makers, including a spouse or out-of-state owner, on the call?
    • Yes
    • No: Reschedule with all decision-makers present.
  5. Are builder and architect identified and receptive to a designer-owned selections schedule?
    • Yes
    • No or unknown: Identify the team and confirm the selections role before proposing.
  6. Do travel and site-visit economics work (for example Chicago or Traverse City)?
    • Yes
    • No: Reprice travel or decline.
  7. Is imported cabinetry and upholstery exposure known, with need dates?
    • Yes
    • No: Assess tariff and lead-time exposure before proposing.
  8. Does calendar capacity meet the requested start?
    • Yes: Go: offer a paid site visit or programming phase.
    • No: Offer a later start or decline.

Six-factor lead score

What does the lead's score indicate?

  1. Total of six criteria scored 1-5 (budget readiness, timeline readiness, decision-maker alignment, scope clarity, trust and seriousness, design fit), maximum 30.
    • 24-30: Proceed to concept proposal.
    • 18-23: Nurture.
    • 12-17: Educate first.
    • Under 12: Low intent.

Fee model for a construction-led studio

Which fee structure fits this engagement?

  1. Is scope fully definable at signing (one room, furnish-only, plans final)?
    • Yes: Flat fee with a stated revision count, defined end date and an hourly rate beyond it.
    • No
  2. Is it a new build or major remodel with a schedule the firm does not control?
    • Yes: Phase-based hybrid: flat or capped for programming, concept and design development; hourly for construction-phase coordination.
    • No: Hourly with an estimate and monthly reporting.
  3. Will the firm purchase product?
    • Yes, client accepts margin: Cost-plus at a disclosed rate.
    • Yes, client is price-transparent: Net pricing plus a procurement or management fee, or hourly procurement.
    • No: Consulting or specification-only agreement, ideally non-purchasing-agent.
  4. Is construction value large and reliably known, and is a percentage fee being considered?
    • Yes: Percentage of construction or FF&E is possible but rewards spending and needs a defined cost base; generally the weakest fit where transparency is contested.
    • No
  5. Does the job have high tariff exposure?
    • Yes: Prefer hourly procurement and short quote windows.
    • No: Keep the structure chosen above.

Delivery model and the designer's position

How does the delivery model set the designer's role and risk?

  1. Who holds the construction contract?
    • Owner holds separate architect and GC contracts, documents complete before bid
    • One entity designs and builds
    • Owner holds a cost-plus contract with a builder
    • Owner holds trade contracts directly
    • Builder owns the project for sale
    • Existing home
  2. Design-bid-build.
    • Continue: Designer is owner's agent or architect's consultant; GC alone directs trades. Main risk: bid excludes or allowances under-carry finishes.
  3. Design-build.
    • Continue: Designer is in-house or sub-consultant, selecting inside the builder's budget; design-builder directs trades. Main risk: loss of independent voice and scope trimmed to margin.
  4. CM or cost-plus (A110 or A103-style; GMP optional).
    • Continue: Designer is an early collaborator as budget iterates with selections; builder directs trades. Main risk: open book exposes every selection cost, and drift.
  5. Owner-builder.
    • Continue: Designer often drifts into de facto coordinator; owner directs trades. Main risk: unlicensed-contracting exposure if directing or paying trades, and no single warranty. Verify with counsel.
  6. Builder-led spec.
    • Continue: Designer is builder's consultant writing a package to a price target. Main risk: little authority, speed-driven.
  7. Remodel.
    • Continue: Designer is separate or in-house, field-verification heavy; remodeler directs trades. Main risk: concealed conditions and phasing while occupied.

New design issue in the field

How is a field issue resolved?

  1. Does it affect code or structure?
    • Yes: Send to engineer or architect by RFI; designer does not answer.
    • No
  2. Does it change design intent?
    • Yes: Designer proposes an answer through the GC.
    • No
  3. Any cost or time effect?
    • Yes: Change order signed before the work.
    • No: Confirm in writing in minutes.
  4. Any owner preference to decide?
    • Yes: Owner decides within the stated window; if missed, GC logs schedule impact.
    • No
  5. Dispute over fault or cost?
    • Yes: Parties meet, then use the contract's mediation or arbitration clause.
    • No: Close and record.

Late selection

How is a selection missing its need-by date resolved?

  1. Is a substitute available within lead time and without dimension change?
    • Yes: Approve substitute.
    • No
  2. Is float available?
    • Yes: Expedite if cost is accepted.
    • No: Resequence, or accept a dated change order for delay.

Quote expiry and tariff price variance

What happens when a vendor price moves?

  1. Is the quote still inside its validity window (as little as 48 hours in cited practice)?
    • Yes
    • No: Requote before client approval.
  2. Has the price risen more than 10%?
    • Yes: Notify the client.
    • No
  3. Client decision
    • Proceed
    • Replace: Substitute product and restart specification.
  4. Is a tariff or surcharge on the vendor invoice?
    • Yes: Show as separate pass-through line tagged to the PO and vendor invoice; keep records in case of refund.
    • No: Proceed to PO.

Receiving and damage claim

How is an incoming shipment handled?

  1. Do cartons match the bill of lading or packing list?
    • Yes
    • No: Note the shortage on delivery paperwork.
  2. Visible damage after photographing and opening?
    • Yes: Note on delivery paperwork; photograph; keep packaging.
    • No
  3. Concealed damage found within 24-72 hours?
    • Yes: Alert carrier or vendor immediately.
    • No: Log as received and release to storage.
  4. Likely cause
    • Carrier: File carrier claim with photos, packaging, proof of value, receipt, bill of lading and invoices.
    • White-glove contractor: Claim against the white-glove contractor; fault chains are complicated.
    • Manufacturing defect: Vendor remake or field repair.

Designer's seat on the builder's platform

How should the designer be set up in the builder's software?

  1. Which platform?
    • Buildertrend
    • CoConstruct (phasing out)
    • Procore or other
  2. Decide before setup
    • Internal user: Full selection authoring; role-based financial exposure. Confirm in writing.
    • Sub or vendor: Fixed limited permissions; not customizable.
  3. Who hired the designer?
    • Builder-side: Builder-side user: edit specs and selections; admins can hide financials.
    • Client-hired: Client-side login: comments, sees pricing and change orders, consumes a client slot.
    • Treated as trade: Trade partner: limited specs and selections, no Questions or Messages.
  4. No designer role confirmed.
    • Continue: Agree one owner for a shared selection schedule, and record access in writing.

Who buys it

Who should purchase this item?

  1. Is the item permanently installed?
    • Yes, by the trades
    • No, loose furnishings: Designer-purchased is workable (A151-style).
  2. Will the builder procure it?
    • Yes: Builder procures, protecting warranty and schedule.
    • No, owner or designer furnishes: Write an explicit interface: warranty, receiving and reinstall responsibility.

Michigan contracting boundary

Does this scope push the firm toward builder licensing and lien issues?

  1. Does the firm contract or offer to build, alter or improve a residential structure?
    • No, design only; construction contract stays with a licensed builder: Appears less exposed. Counsel to confirm.
    • Yes or unclear
  2. Does it subcontract trades, run built-in installation, hold construction money, or bundle installation into its price?
    • Yes: Risk rises under MCL 339.2401 and 339.2412. Resolve with counsel before finalizing templates.
    • No: Counsel to confirm.
  3. Does the contract also cover affixed built-ins or fixtures?
    • Yes: Lien rights may reach only part of a mixed contract; include MCL 570.1114 statement and written-change discipline if counsel says it applies; collect goods funds before ordering.
    • No, furniture only: Furniture appears outside improvement; do not rely on a lien. Collect goods funds before ordering.

Who permits this parcel

Which agencies govern this parcel?

  1. Identify jurisdiction by parcel, not mailing address.
    • Done
  2. Is the parcel in a High Risk Erosion Area or Critical Dune Area?
    • Yes
    • No
  3. EGLE pre-application meeting before fixing footprint and driveway.
    • Done: Treat EGLE approval as a design constraint.
  4. Earth change of 1 acre or more, or within 500 ft of a lake or stream?
    • Yes: Obtain soil erosion permit, then building and trade permits.
    • No: Obtain building and trade permits; confirm any local soil erosion rule.

Which contract form to start from

What base contract should a non-architect firm use?

  1. Is the firm an architect?
    • Yes: AIA B152-2019 family is drafted for this role.
    • No
  2. Counsel available to adapt a designer agreement?
    • Yes: Start from the ASID Residential Package, use AIA documents as structural reference, and add tariff, client-funds and Michigan terms.
    • No: Obtain counsel before relying on low-cost templates; none showed Michigan or construction-led tailoring.

Studio software stack

Which systems should the studio run?

  1. Does the firm need POs and accounting in one system?
    • Yes: Studio Designer or Design Manager, plus CAD (Chief Architect or equivalent) and a light PM tool.
    • No, accounting stays separate: Programa, plus CAD and a light PM tool; its accounting integrations were not confirmed.

Run the simulator on one of your own projects.

Request a walkthrough